The digital age has clearly arrived, and the money as we know it is undergoing a digital transformation just like everything else.
Digital payments have become globally ubiquitous with the advent of mobile phone-based apps that facilitate spending and banking. CBDC, or central bank digital currency, is partially designed to defend against encroachment on sovereign money by cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
On the surface, CBDC is simply a digital form of the currency issued by central banks and a bigger leap towards a cashless world. Nonetheless, its profound implications might extend beyond the realm of a specific country’s banking system.
Generally, the two main types of CBDC are wholesale, which is only available to commercial banks, and retail, which is available to all. A CDBC payment system doesn’t require physical infrastructure, and its efficiency, low cost, and ease of use benefit consumers and businesses alike.
The appeal of this technology is greater in countries where per capita incomes are low, transactions are small, and physical bank branches are few. The concept greatly improves financial inclusion, as evidenced by the early movers like the Bahamas, Nigeria, and Cambodia, where millions of unbanked and underbanked are finding new access to financial services.
It is intriguing that emerging market economies are leading the way in the sphere of CBDC, as the transformative potential and the benefits that accrue from these changes are far greater in developing economies than in richer ones with more sophisticated financial systems.
If the concept creeps beyond national borders as many have envisioned, an interlinked CBDC system could eventually challenge the dominance of the U.S. dollar in the global financial regime. Bakong is known for promoting usage of the Cambodian riel over the U.S. dollar, which still dominates transactions in Cambodia. The EU’s plans to strengthen the euro over the dollar include creation of a digital euro. China’s efforts over the years to globalize its currency have made even more global headlines than the EU’s. The quick rise of the digital yuan has undoubtedly added fuel to speculation over the yuan’s ability to rival the dollar.
CBDC is still early in its development. Most countries are only starting to explore the idea. Yet clear signs are emerging that CBDCs will reshape the current financial landscape, mostly likely in a fundamental way.
For fresh upstarts seeking to overtake more advanced competitors in the sovereign currency arena, central bank digital currency (CBDC) could be just the ticket.
Nigeria, known for its struggles with poverty, is home to around 87 million people living in extreme poverty yet poised near the front of the global CBDC race after the launch of the eNaira in October 2021. It was the second officially launched CBDC after the Bahamas’ Sand Dollar.
Relatedly, Cambodia, one of the poorest nations in Asia, was ranked second behind only the Bahamas on PwC’s April 2021 global retail CBDC development maturity rankings. PwC is a world leader in management consulting. The Chinese mainland, the first major economy to pilot a CBDC, took the third place on the rankings. In contrast, the U.S. Federal Reserve finally published its long-anticipated paper on a digital dollar on January 20. The Fed hasn’t taken a position yet on issuing a U.S. CBDC.
The seemingly illogical global development has become a stark reminder of how the global currency landscape has been retooling itself over recent years after the rise of blockchain-based cryptocurrencies facilitated a break from conventional money.
Underpinned by blockchain, a technology that permanently records transactions, typically in a decentralized and public database called a ledger, cryptocurrencies enable ownership of virtual property without the need for central authority.
With Bitcoin and its many CBDC counterparts increasingly considered a threat to sovereign money, it makes perfect sense for sovereign money to evolve into CBDCs.
As its name implies, CBDC refers to digital money issued by the central bank. While digital payments normally facilitate online transactions, most CBDC solutions seek to pack offline capacities, with Bluetooth and nearfield communication mostly proposed and resorted to as the underlying technology to support point-to-point payments.
Still, what makes it essentially different from all other cashless payment instruments including credit cards, electronic payment, and cryptocurrencies is that CBDC is a direct liability of the central bank, consequently considered the safest form of digital money. Other forms of cashless means are mostly liabilities on the balance sheet of commercial banks.
Generally, CBDC falls into one of two categories: a retail or general purpose CBDC if it’s intended to be used as a digital extension of cash by all individuals and businesses, or wholesale if it grants only restricted access by permitted institutions.
Understandably, CBDC has arrived at the mainstream of central bank roadmapping.
Out of 65 central banks responding to a CBDC-themed survey by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in late 2020, 86 percent revealed some form of active CBDC engagement, according to survey results released in January 2021.
Roughly 60 percent of surveyed central banks “are conducting experiments or proofs-of-concept,” while 14 percent are working on pilot projects.
The respondents, according to BIS, represent nearly 72 percent of the global population and 91 percent of the world’s economic output.
With CBDC initiatives bringing unbanked, underserved population into the payments system, weak links transformed into strengths in the case of the Bahamas and Cambodia.
With the prevalent use of smartphones making it easy to open a digital bank account, CBDCs have emerged as a lifesaver for many of the most financial inclusionhungry places that have been previously dampened by poor financial infrastructure, economic backwardness, or both.
It makes sense that some of the traditionally least-involved nations in the global financial sphere have been rushing to get a head start over more prominent economies.
The Bahamas is relatively well off, according to its US$27,196.69 per capita GDP in 2020, equivalent to 215 percent of the global average, according to Trading Economics data.
In comparison, China’s per capita GDP topped US$10,000 for the first time in history just in 2019, per official data.
The wealth failed to translate into a readily available network of banking facilities because the Bahamas, an archipelagic state consisting of more than 700 islands, is inherently unfriendly to the concept of automated teller machines or bank branches being physically built. Frequently severe weather adds to the cost of infrastructure maintenance.
With mobile devices vastly popular among the local population at a penetration rate of up to 90 percent according to media reports, CBDC has been deeply appealing to the island state since the concept emerged.
Among the Sand Dollar’s key specifications is its offline functionality that ensures that the digital fiat remains in work mode even if communication between islands gets disconnected in case of extreme weather events.
Cambodia’s move to a CBDC-like initiative can also be understood.
Amidst COVID-19-inflicted pressure, the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) launched a CBDC-like payment system known as Bakong in October 2020, effectively funneling it to largely unbanked areas where residents are hugely handset-savvy, heralding a new era of central bank-backed financial inclusion.
Bakong, developed by the NBC in collaboration with Japanese blockchain firm Soramitsu, can be downloaded from app stores, enabling money transfers without the necessity of a traditional bank account.
Users of the Bakong app had reached roughly 270,000 as of November 2021, according to a January Nikkei Asia report citing Cambodian central bank data.
This, in addition to the central bank’s partnerships with local banks to operate and expand the payment system, resulted in the currency reaching roughly 7.9 million people, or about half Cambodia’s population, the report revealed.
It’s noteworthy that disputes linger about Cambodia’s quasi- CBDC approach because there’s no involvement of specially designed digital currency. Instead, Bakong allows digital payments both in U.S. dollars and Cambodian currency, riel, under the Southeast Asian economy’s dual-currency system. Still, it offers a glimpse into marked CBDC progress across the ASEAN Plus Three bloc consisting of 10 ASEAN nations and China, China, Japan, and South Korea.
Arguing against the description of CBDC as a one-size-fits-all solution, the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office, in a note in January, spoke highly of CBDC headway in the bloc.
Cambodia, alongside the Chinese mainland and South Korea, is considered home to many of the world’s most mature retail projects, while China’s Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Japan, Singapore, and Thailand are reputed to have the world’s most mature wholesale CBDC projects, according to the note, citing PwC findings.
And the latest move came from Benjamin Diokno, governor of Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, the Philippines’ central bank, who announced plans to roll out a pilot CBDC implementation soon while addressing an event on CBDC in Manila at the end of February.
In Nigeria, the African CBDC trailblazer, the roadmap toward CBDC readiness has been fueled, likewise, by burgeoning mobile internet usage.
But Nigeria’s youth has unique enthusiasm for cryptocurrency after runaway inflation and weakened currency in the African country pushed its citizens to the edge, thereby leading to rampant use of Bitcoin among other cryptocurrencies as alternatives to the Nigerian naira.
As of press time, the naira’s spot exchange rate against the dollar was hovering well above 410, weakened substantially from around 300 at the start of 2020, per Trading Economics.
Its annual inflation rate fell marginally to 15.6 percent in January, official numbers showed.
Fears that cryptocurrencies could overtake the naira as a dominant currency of Nigeria have been cited for leading to the launch of the eNaira, months after a ban on local banks and financial institutions getting involved in crypto-related transactions.
While financial inclusion is considered a major pull of CBDC availability, a much talked-about yet highly contentious factor behind CBDC initiatives is its resultant move, deliberately or not, away from the U.S. dollar-centric global financial regime.
As is well known, the dollar has become the backbone of the international currency system since the Bretton Woods system of monetary management was created in July 1944. The system required a currency peg to the U.S. dollar which was in turn pegged to the price of gold. The Bretton Woods System collapsed in the 1970s but continues to influence international currency exchange and trade through its creation of the IMF and World Bank and cementing the U.S. dollar’s role as the global currency.
Founded in 1973, the Belgiumbased Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is, not surprisingly, denominated in U.S. dollars.
The dollar-denominated financial messaging network, with three data centers in the U.S., the Netherlands, and Switzerland, links global banks and handles a galaxy of daily payment instructions across 200-plus countries and regions and more than 11,000 financial institutions.
This is why a cutoff from SWIFT has been described as a financial nuclear weapon. Kicking selected Russian banks out of the SWIFT system as a sanction against Russia amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict speaks volumes to the world’s continued focus on the greenback, Washington’s financial avatar.
Russia is considered second only to the U.S. in terms of financial institution membership in the system.
However, beneath the dollar’s seeming invincibility, rifts that tend to be detrimental to the dollar’s dominant role have become increasingly conspicuous, a trend that has been gaining steam in the CBDC’s wake.
A striking example is Bakong, known for promoting a push away from the dollar, which still dominates transactions in Cambodia, towards Cambodian riels.
With unabashed unilateralism during the Trump era frustrating EUUS relations, even the EU has been looking away from the dollar.
The continent’s defiance was evidenced by an EU plan to beef up the global role of the Euro according to media reports on the January 2021 dollar-distancing proposal.
“At times, unilateral actions by third countries have compromised legitimate trade and investment of EU businesses with other countries,” Bloomberg reported, citing the document it obtained.
The EU’s moves to strengthen the euro over the dollar include creation of a digital euro.
In July 2021, the Governing Council of the European Central Bank announced the launch of a 24-month investigation phase of a digital euro project, aiming to address key issues in design and distribution.
China’s efforts over the years to globalize its currency have made headlines across the world, more overwhelmingly than the EU’s. Part of the internationalized yuan push was the launch of the yuan-denominated Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) in 2015.
Unlike SWIFT that handles payment-related messaging and carries instructions, CIPS is a settlement and clearing system that still uses SWIFT messaging and formats. As measured by functionality, CIPS is tantamount to the Clearing House Interbank Payments System (CHIPS), the primary clearing house in the U.S. for dollarbased electronic payments.
There’s speculation that CIPS could run its own messaging network and eventually operate independently from SWIFT, although that remains a longterm vision.
The quick advance of the digital yuan, officially called the Digital Currency Electronic Payment and dubbed e-CNY, has undoubtedly added fuel to speculation over the yuan’s rivalry versus the dollar.
As a sign of fast-paced progress, the digital yuan was announced as the preferred currency at the Beijing Winter Olympics.
For perspective, the dollar was already feeling pressure before the digital yuan and a merely conceptual digital Euro began to invoke their magic.
In January, the yuan remained the fourth most active currency for global payments in value terms, with its share rising to a record high of 3.2 percent, according to SWIFT data. The dollar topped the ranking with 39.92 percent followed by the Euro’s 36.56 percent and the British pound sterling’s 6.3 percent.
Last January, the yuan’s share of global payments currency stood at merely 1.65 percent, while the dollar accounted for 40.81 percent and the euro 33.58 percent.
As the digital yuan is technically ready for cross-border use, albeit presently mainly used for domestic retail payment, China’s central bank said in July 2021 in a white paper on its digital fiat R&D progress, globalization of the yuan could be expedited much more efficiently than the current CIPS approach.
While CIPS still has to rely on SWIFT, the digital yuan, whose trials kicked off in late 2019, puts China among the most pioneering in carving out a path to global monetary clout independent of the conventional sphere of influence backed by CHIPS and SWIFT.
That said, the digital yuan has yet to emerge as a game changer for international trade and could take a long time.
In a bylined article in November, Arnold Gao, senior director analyst at market research firm Gartner, wrote that in terms of internationalization of the yuan, “it depends more on the political and economic choices of the trading partners because technology is the last-mile effort rather than a game changer.”
Acceptance of the digital yuan in overseas markets might be subject to uncertainties in China’s relations with its major trading partners including Europe and Japan, said Cao Yin, managing director of the Shanghaibased Digital Renaissance Foundation.
Digital Dollar Hesitancy
With the global race for CBDC readiness all the rage, a big question mark hangs over a rather hesitant stance on the digital dollar.
China’s technological rise has shown to be worrying enough to unite U.S. legislators behind efforts such as the America COMPETES Act, which passed the House in February, and the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act, which passed the Senate last July. Both proposed funds to be allocated to semiconductor chip manufacturing. So why hasn’t the digital yuan prompted the U.S. to roll out its digital fiat?
For starters, with its population adequately banked, the U.S. is far less motivated to bank on a CBDC to improve its financial inclusion.
In 2019, 94.6 percent of U.S. households were banked, suggesting at least one household member had a checking or savings account, according to data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The U.S. leadership, as gauged by its banked population, nonetheless, is considered to have contributed to its lagging in adoption of mobile payments. By comparison, a large unbanked population in China energized usage of mobile payments.
The Fed’s January CBDC report only shattered the hopes of those hoping for the U.S. central bank to fire the starting pistol on the digital dollar.
The report mentioned the disturbing possibility of the dollar’s global use decreasing if CBDCs introduced by many foreign countries and currency unions grew more appealing than existing forms of the dollar.
A U.S. CBDC could preserve the global role of the greenback, the Fed said in the report. It cited the possibility of complex policy issues and risks resulting from the introduction of a CBDC as a digital liability of the Fed that is publicly available.
Efficacy of monetary policy implementation is one inhibitor of the Fed’s move toward the digital dollar.
Unanticipated surges in CBDC could “put upward pressure on the federal funds rate,” read the report, which also discussed more complicated interactions between a U.S. CBDC option and monetary policy implementation if CBDC were interestbearing at levels comparable to yields on other safe assets, notably factoring the potentially significant foreign demand for the digital dollar.
With the Fed policy making now centering on its pace of rate hikes, impacting global markets, a future state in which an American CBDC could make Fed moves all the more far-reaching in global monetary policy terms seems to justify a more prudent approach to the digital dollar.
Such concerns, however, are barely sufficient to prevent the Fed from setting out its CBDC trial, as the launch of a CBDC project is far from mature enough to be a factor to consider in monetary policymaking.
Cao offered an explanation: The digital dollar remains on the back burner of the Fed, whose top priority now is a finely calibrated cycle of rate spikes to tame its record-high inflation.
The U.S. consumer price index rallied 7.9 percent in February from the year before, its highest level in four decades, according to U.S. labor department figures.
A surge in crude oil prices amid the Russia-Ukraine tensions is seen as piling up the pressure on the Fed to normalize its monetary policy.
More plausibly, the hesitancy toward the launch of a U.S. CBDC, potentially amplified by inflation woes, testifies to Washington’s confidence in the dollar’s strength being the persistent foil preventing the imminent leap into the CBDC battlefield. After all, even Bitcoin is valued against the dollar.
It’s unknown, however, how long that boost of confidence will last, or if the digital yuan, alongside a rising number of CBDCs around the world, might someday facilitate a fundamental and transformative change to the global currency system.